Falkland Islands, Malvinas vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Falkland Islands, Malvinas
100.0%
in 2024
New Zealand
100.0%
in 2024
Falkland Islands, Malvinas rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Falkland Islands, Malvinas
  • New Zealand
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Falkland Islands, Malvinas currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Falkland Islands, Malvinas ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Falkland Islands, Malvinas New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
2010s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Falkland Islands, Malvinas or New Zealand?
Falkland Islands, Malvinas, at 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Falkland Islands, Malvinas and New Zealand?
0.0%, with Falkland Islands, Malvinas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Falkland Islands, Malvinas and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Falkland Islands, Malvinas and New Zealand rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Falkland Islands, Malvinas ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Falkland Islands, Malvinas vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/falkland-islands/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/falkland-islands/new-zealand/">Falkland Islands, Malvinas vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.