Ghana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Ghana
100.0%
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
100.0%
in 2024
Ghana rank
1st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Ghana
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 92.9% 91.2% 1.7% Ghana
2010s 96.6% 96.3% 0.3% Ghana
2020s 99.3% 99.7% 0.4% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Ghana or Sao Tome and Principe?
Ghana, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Ghana and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0%, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Sao Tome and Principe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Ghana and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Ghana ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/ghana/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/ghana/sao-tome-and-principe/">Ghana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.