Gibraltar vs Hong Kong: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Gibraltar
100.0%
in 2024
Hong Kong
100.0%
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
1st
Hong Kong rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Hong Kong
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 99.2% 0.8% Gibraltar
2010s 100.0% 99.8% 0.2% Gibraltar
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Gibraltar or Hong Kong?
Gibraltar, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Gibraltar and Hong Kong?
0.0%, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Hong Kong?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Gibraltar and Hong Kong rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Gibraltar ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Hong Kong: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/gibraltar/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/gibraltar/hong-kong-sar-china/">Gibraltar vs Hong Kong: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.