Guinea-Bissau vs Papua New Guinea: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Guinea-Bissau
91.1%
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
89.4%
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
180th
Papua New Guinea rank
183rd

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Papua New Guinea
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 91.1% against 89.4% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.7%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 180th and Papua New Guinea ranks 183rd of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 81.1% 86.5% 5.4% Papua New Guinea
2010s 87.2% 87.9% 0.7% Papua New Guinea
2020s 91.0% 89.1% 1.9% Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Guinea-Bissau or Papua New Guinea?
Guinea-Bissau, at 91.1% against 89.4% in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea?
1.7%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 180th and Papua New Guinea ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Papua New Guinea: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/guinea-bissau/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/guinea-bissau/papua-new-guinea/">Guinea-Bissau vs Papua New Guinea: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.