Hong Kong vs Malta: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Hong Kong
100.0%
in 2024
Malta
100.0%
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
1st
Malta rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Malta
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Malta, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 99.2% 100.0% 0.8% Malta
2010s 99.8% 100.0% 0.2% Malta
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Hong Kong or Malta?
Hong Kong, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Hong Kong and Malta?
0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malta?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Malta rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Hong Kong ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Malta: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong vs Malta: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.