Lao People's Democratic Republic vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Lao People's Democratic Republic
100.0%
in 2024
New Zealand
100.0%
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • New Zealand
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 188 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 83.6% 100.0% 16.4% New Zealand
2010s 92.6% 100.0% 7.4% New Zealand
2020s 99.1% 100.0% 0.9% New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Lao People's Democratic Republic or New Zealand?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Lao People's Democratic Republic and New Zealand?
0.0%, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and New Zealand rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/lao-pdr/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/lao-pdr/new-zealand/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.