Naoero vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Naoero
98.4%
in 2024
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
98.4%
in 2018
Naoero rank
130th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
129th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Naoero
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 98.4% against 98.4% in Naoero, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Naoero ahead.

Naoero ranks 130th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 129th of 188 countries.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2000s 98.3% 96.5% 1.9% Naoero
2010s 98.4% 98.2% 0.2% Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Naoero or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 98.4% against 98.4% in Naoero as of 2018.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Naoero and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.0%, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
How do Naoero and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Naoero ranks 130th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 129th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/naoero/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/naoero/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Naoero vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.