North Macedonia vs Turkmenistan: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

North Macedonia
99.9%
in 2024
Turkmenistan
99.9%
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
77th
Turkmenistan rank
76th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Turkmenistan
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 99.9% against 99.9% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 77th and Turkmenistan ranks 76th of 188 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2000s 99.8% 100.0% 0.2% Turkmenistan
2010s 99.9% 99.9% 0.0% Turkmenistan
2020s 99.9% 99.9% 0.0% Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, North Macedonia or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 99.9% against 99.9% in North Macedonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between North Macedonia and Turkmenistan?
0.0%, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Turkmenistan?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do North Macedonia and Turkmenistan rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
North Macedonia ranks 77th and Turkmenistan ranks 76th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Turkmenistan: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/north-macedonia/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/north-macedonia/turkmenistan/">North Macedonia vs Turkmenistan: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.