Papua New Guinea vs Somalia: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Papua New Guinea
89.4%
in 2024
Somalia
90.2%
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
183rd
Somalia rank
181st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Somalia
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 90.2% against 89.4% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.8%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 183rd and Somalia ranks 181st of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Somalia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Somalia Difference Ahead
2000s 86.5% 80.4% 6.1% Papua New Guinea
2010s 87.9% 85.4% 2.5% Papua New Guinea
2020s 89.1% 89.2% 0.1% Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Papua New Guinea or Somalia?
Somalia, at 90.2% against 89.4% in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Papua New Guinea and Somalia?
0.8%, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Somalia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Somalia rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Papua New Guinea ranks 183rd and Somalia ranks 181st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Somalia: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/papua-new-guinea/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/papua-new-guinea/somalia-fed-rep/">Papua New Guinea vs Somalia: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.