Papua New Guinea vs South Sudan: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Papua New Guinea
89.4%
in 2024
South Sudan
87.4%
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
183rd
South Sudan rank
184th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • South Sudan
020406080200020122024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 89.4% against 87.4% in South Sudan, a difference of 2.0%.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 183rd and South Sudan ranks 184th of 188 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 88.0% 80.6% 7.4% Papua New Guinea
2020s 89.1% 86.8% 2.2% Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Papua New Guinea or South Sudan?
Papua New Guinea, at 89.4% against 87.4% in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Papua New Guinea and South Sudan?
2.0%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and South Sudan?
14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Papua New Guinea ranks 183rd and South Sudan ranks 184th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs South Sudan: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/papua-new-guinea/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/papua-new-guinea/south-sudan/">Papua New Guinea vs South Sudan: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.