Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Sao Tome and Principe
100.0%
in 2024
Uruguay
100.0%
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Uruguay
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 91.2% 99.4% 8.2% Uruguay
2010s 96.3% 99.8% 3.5% Uruguay
2020s 99.7% 100.0% 0.3% Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Sao Tome and Principe or Uruguay?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Uruguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay?
0.0%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/sao-tome-and-principe/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/sao-tome-and-principe/uruguay/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.