Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Share of urban population using at least basic water services
Chad
77.9%
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
78.1%
in 2017
Chad rank
181st
Equatorial Guinea rank
180th
Share of urban population using at least basic water services over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 78.1% against 77.9% in Chad, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.4% | 68.9% | 6.5% | Chad |
| 2010s | 76.9% | 77.3% | 0.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of urban population using at least basic water services, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 78.1% against 77.9% in Chad as of 2017.
- What is the difference in share of urban population using at least basic water services between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.2%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for share of urban population using at least basic water services?
- Chad ranks 181st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 180th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of urban population using at least basic water services. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, which is either located on their premises, or at a collection point, which takes no more than 30 minutes for a roundtrip.