Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas

Burkina Faso
81.5%
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
79.3%
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
176th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
178th

Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020406080200020122024

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 81.5% against 79.3% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.2%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 176th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 178th of 188 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 79.0% 76.1% 2.9% Burkina Faso
2010s 80.2% 77.9% 2.3% Burkina Faso
2020s 81.2% 79.2% 2.0% Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas, Burkina Faso or Sao Tome and Principe?
Burkina Faso, at 81.5% against 79.3% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas between Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe?
2.2%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas?
Burkina Faso ranks 176th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-using-at-least-basic-drinking-water/burkina-faso/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-using-at-least-basic-drinking-water/burkina-faso/sao-tome-and-principe/">Burkina Faso vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, which is either located on their premises, or at a collection point, which takes no more than 30 minutes for a roundtrip.