Finland vs San Marino: Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas
Finland
100.0%
in 2024
San Marino
100.0%
in 2024
Finland rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st
Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Finland
- San Marino
How they compare
Finland currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in San Marino, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas, Finland or San Marino?
- Finland, at 100.0% against 100.0% in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas between Finland and San Marino?
- 0.0%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and San Marino?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Finland and San Marino rank globally for using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas?
- Finland ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, which is either located on their premises, or at a collection point, which takes no more than 30 minutes for a roundtrip.