Macao vs Malta: Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas
Macao
100.0%
in 2024
Malta
100.0%
in 2024
Macao rank
1st
Malta rank
1st
Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Macao
- Malta
How they compare
Macao currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Malta, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Macao ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas, Macao or Malta?
- Macao, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas between Macao and Malta?
- 0.0%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Macao and Malta rank globally for using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas?
- Macao ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using at least basic drinking water sources in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, which is either located on their premises, or at a collection point, which takes no more than 30 minutes for a roundtrip.