Afghanistan vs Ukraine: Urea — Agricultural Use

Afghanistan
519,122 t
in 2018
Ukraine
518,609 t
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
20th
Ukraine rank
21st

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Ukraine
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200220132024

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 519,122 t against 518,609 t in Ukraine, a difference of 513 t.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 20th and Ukraine ranks 21st of 139 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 56,509 t 257,293 t 200,784 t Ukraine
2010s 232,811 t 528,902 t 296,091 t Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Afghanistan or Ukraine?
Afghanistan, at 519,122 t against 518,609 t in Ukraine as of 2018.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Afghanistan and Ukraine?
513 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Ukraine?
6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
How do Afghanistan and Ukraine rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Afghanistan ranks 20th and Ukraine ranks 21st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf