Albania vs Austria: Urea — Agricultural Use

Albania
18,765 t
in 2022
Austria
18,486 t
in 2024
Albania rank
81st
Austria rank
82nd

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Albania
  • Austria
020.0k40.0k60.0k200220132024

How they compare

Albania currently reports 18,765 t against 18,486 t in Austria, a difference of 279 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Albania ahead.

Albania ranks 81st and Austria ranks 82nd of 139 countries.

Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Austria Difference Ahead
2000s 32,671 t 28,082 t 4,589 t Albania
2010s 42,315 t 29,041 t 13,273 t Albania
2020s 32,767 t 24,974 t 7,793 t Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Albania or Austria?
Albania, at 18,765 t against 18,486 t in Austria as of 2022.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Albania and Austria?
279 t, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Austria?
14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Albania and Austria rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Albania ranks 81st and Austria ranks 82nd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf