Albania vs Libya: Urea — Agricultural Use

Albania
18,765 t
in 2022
Libya
20,000 t
in 2016
Albania rank
81st
Libya rank
79th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Albania
  • Libya
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k200220122022

How they compare

Libya currently reports 20,000 t against 18,765 t in Albania, a difference of 1,235 t.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.

Albania ranks 81st and Libya ranks 79th of 139 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Libya Difference Ahead
2000s 33,621 t 86,000 t 52,379 t Libya
2010s 37,631 t 20,500 t 17,131 t Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Albania or Libya?
Libya, at 20,000 t against 18,765 t in Albania as of 2016.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Albania and Libya?
1,235 t, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Libya?
9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
How do Albania and Libya rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Albania ranks 81st and Libya ranks 79th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf