Angola vs Burundi: Urea — Agricultural Use

Angola
7,029 t
in 2011
Burundi
8,418 t
in 2016
Angola rank
93rd
Burundi rank
90th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Angola
  • Burundi
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200220092016

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 8,418 t against 7,029 t in Angola, a difference of 1,389 t.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 93rd and Burundi ranks 90th of 139 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Burundi Difference Ahead
2000s 3,158 t 1,005 t 2,153 t Angola
2010s 4,656 t 3,154 t 1,502 t Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Angola or Burundi?
Burundi, at 8,418 t against 7,029 t in Angola as of 2016.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Angola and Burundi?
1,389 t, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Burundi?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Angola and Burundi rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Angola ranks 93rd and Burundi ranks 90th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf