Angola vs Madagascar: Urea — Agricultural Use

Angola
7,029 t
in 2011
Madagascar
7,125 t
in 2011
Angola rank
93rd
Madagascar rank
92nd

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Angola
  • Madagascar
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200220062011

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 7,125 t against 7,029 t in Angola, a difference of 96 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Madagascar ahead.

Angola ranks 93rd and Madagascar ranks 92nd of 139 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Madagascar Difference Ahead
2000s 3,158 t 5,567 t 2,409 t Madagascar
2010s 4,656 t 6,486 t 1,830 t Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Angola or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 7,125 t against 7,029 t in Angola as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Angola and Madagascar?
96 t, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Madagascar?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Angola and Madagascar rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Angola ranks 93rd and Madagascar ranks 92nd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf