Armenia vs Denmark: Urea — Agricultural Use

Armenia
6,222 t
in 2022
Denmark
5,931 t
in 2023
Armenia rank
97th
Denmark rank
98th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Armenia
  • Denmark
02.0k4.0k6.0k200220122023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 6,222 t against 5,931 t in Denmark, a difference of 291 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 97th and Denmark ranks 98th of 139 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Denmark in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 1,429 t 1,347 t 82 t Armenia
2010s 2,249 t 1,093 t 1,156 t Armenia
2020s 3,040 t 5,131 t 2,090 t Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Armenia or Denmark?
Armenia, at 6,222 t against 5,931 t in Denmark as of 2022.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Armenia and Denmark?
291 t, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Denmark?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
How do Armenia and Denmark rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Armenia ranks 97th and Denmark ranks 98th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf