Armenia vs Guinea: Urea — Agricultural Use

Armenia
6,222 t
in 2022
Guinea
6,900 t
in 2017
Armenia rank
97th
Guinea rank
95th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Armenia
  • Guinea
02.0k4.0k6.0k200220122022

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 6,900 t against 6,222 t in Armenia, a difference of 678 t.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guinea ahead.

Armenia ranks 97th and Guinea ranks 95th of 139 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 807.83 t 383.67 t 424.17 t Armenia
2010s 2,053 t 310 t 1,743 t Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Armenia or Guinea?
Guinea, at 6,900 t against 6,222 t in Armenia as of 2017.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Armenia and Guinea?
678 t, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Guinea?
8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Armenia and Guinea rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Armenia ranks 97th and Guinea ranks 95th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf