Azerbaijan vs Bahrain: Urea — Agricultural Use

Azerbaijan
1,023 t
in 2011
Bahrain
1,000 t
in 2011
Azerbaijan rank
113th
Bahrain rank
114th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahrain
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200220062011

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 1,023 t against 1,000 t in Bahrain, a difference of 23 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bahrain ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 113th and Bahrain ranks 114th of 139 countries.

Bahrain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Bahrain Difference Ahead
2000s 355.33 t 13,457 t 13,102 t Bahrain
2010s 849.5 t 2,962 t 2,112 t Bahrain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Azerbaijan or Bahrain?
Azerbaijan, at 1,023 t against 1,000 t in Bahrain as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Azerbaijan and Bahrain?
23 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bahrain?
8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Azerbaijan and Bahrain rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Azerbaijan ranks 113th and Bahrain ranks 114th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf