Bangladesh vs Indonesia: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- Bangladesh
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 5.29 million t against 2.70 million t in Bangladesh, a difference of 2.59 million t.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 2.0 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 7th and Indonesia ranks 4th of 139 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.27 million t | 4.75 million t | 2.48 million t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 2.46 million t | 5.08 million t | 2.62 million t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 2.60 million t | 4.58 million t | 1.98 million t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Bangladesh or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 5.29 million t against 2.70 million t in Bangladesh as of 2022.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Bangladesh and Indonesia?
- 2.59 million t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Indonesia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Bangladesh and Indonesia rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- Bangladesh ranks 7th and Indonesia ranks 4th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf