Bangladesh vs Syrian Arab Republic: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- Bangladesh
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 2.70 million t against 219,262 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 2.48 million t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 12.3 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 7th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 5th of 129 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.45 million t | 318,424 t | 2.13 million t | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 2.65 million t | 219,262 t | 2.43 million t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Bangladesh or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Bangladesh, at 2.70 million t against 219,262 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Bangladesh and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 2.48 million t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Bangladesh and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- Bangladesh ranks 7th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 5th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf