Barbados vs Bhutan: Urea — Agricultural Use

Barbados
1,263 t
in 2011
Bhutan
986 t
in 2024
Barbados rank
112th
Bhutan rank
115th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Barbados
  • Bhutan
02.0k4.0k6.0k200220132024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 1,263 t against 986 t in Bhutan, a difference of 277 t.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bhutan ahead.

Barbados ranks 112th and Bhutan ranks 115th of 139 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Bhutan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Bhutan Difference Ahead
2000s 2,223 t 1,486 t 736.8 t Barbados
2010s 782 t 1,340 t 558.5 t Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Barbados or Bhutan?
Barbados, at 1,263 t against 986 t in Bhutan as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Barbados and Bhutan?
277 t, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Bhutan?
7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Barbados and Bhutan rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Barbados ranks 112th and Bhutan ranks 115th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf