Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Paraguay: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 25,798 t against 24,338 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1,460 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Paraguay ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th and Paraguay ranks 66th of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15,055 t | 10,103 t | 4,951 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 24,338 t | 25,798 t | 1,460 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 25,798 t against 24,338 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2011.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Paraguay?
- 1,460 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Paraguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Paraguay rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th and Paraguay ranks 66th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf