Burundi vs Suriname: Urea — Agricultural Use

Burundi
8,418 t
in 2016
Suriname
9,185 t
in 2011
Burundi rank
90th
Suriname rank
89th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Burundi
  • Suriname
05.0k10.0k15.0k200220092016

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 9,185 t against 8,418 t in Burundi, a difference of 767 t.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 90th and Suriname ranks 89th of 139 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 744.67 t 10,518 t 9,773 t Suriname
2010s 3,154 t 9,662 t 6,507 t Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Burundi or Suriname?
Suriname, at 9,185 t against 8,418 t in Burundi as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Burundi and Suriname?
767 t, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Suriname?
8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Burundi and Suriname rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Burundi ranks 90th and Suriname ranks 89th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf