Cameroon vs Dominican Republic: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- Cameroon
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 74,476 t against 70,243 t in Cameroon, a difference of 4,233 t.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 55th and Dominican Republic ranks 54th of 129 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36,980 t | 54,097 t | 17,117 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 47,852 t | 70,877 t | 23,024 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 60,366 t | 92,681 t | 32,315 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Cameroon or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 74,476 t against 70,243 t in Cameroon as of 2022.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Cameroon and Dominican Republic?
- 4,233 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Dominican Republic?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Cameroon and Dominican Republic rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- Cameroon ranks 55th and Dominican Republic ranks 54th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf