Chile vs Iraq: Urea — Agricultural Use

Chile
474,687 t
in 2024
Iraq
368,975 t
in 2021
Chile rank
23rd
Iraq rank
25th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Chile
  • Iraq
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k200420142024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 474,687 t against 368,975 t in Iraq, a difference of 105,712 t.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Iraq's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 23rd and Iraq ranks 25th of 139 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 438,760 t 250,804 t 187,957 t Chile
2010s 524,102 t 218,721 t 305,381 t Chile
2020s 519,938 t 362,130 t 157,808 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Chile or Iraq?
Chile, at 474,687 t against 368,975 t in Iraq as of 2024.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Chile and Iraq?
105,712 t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iraq?
12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
How do Chile and Iraq rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Chile ranks 23rd and Iraq ranks 25th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf