Chile vs Lithuania: Urea — Agricultural Use

Chile
474,687 t
in 2024
Lithuania
499,977 t
in 2011
Chile rank
23rd
Lithuania rank
22nd

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Chile
  • Lithuania
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200420142024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 499,977 t against 474,687 t in Chile, a difference of 25,290 t.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 22nd of 139 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 441,214 t 383,506 t 57,708 t Chile
2010s 514,825 t 376,154 t 138,672 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Chile or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 499,977 t against 474,687 t in Chile as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Chile and Lithuania?
25,290 t, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Chile ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 22nd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf