Chile vs New Zealand: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 474,687 t against 418,460 t in New Zealand, a difference of 56,227 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 21st of 128 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 449,589 t | 433,720 t | 15,869 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 524,456 t | 522,810 t | 1,646 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 476,989 t | 505,886 t | 28,897 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 474,687 t against 418,460 t in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Chile and New Zealand?
- 56,227 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- Chile ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 21st of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf