Cyprus vs Tunisia: Urea — Agricultural Use

Cyprus
3,615 t
in 2024
Tunisia
3,706 t
in 2016
Cyprus rank
105th
Tunisia rank
104th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Cyprus
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k200220132024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 3,706 t against 3,615 t in Cyprus, a difference of 91 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tunisia ahead.

Cyprus ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 139 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 1,081 t 9,806 t 8,726 t Tunisia
2010s 3,307 t 3,148 t 158.4 t Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Cyprus or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 3,706 t against 3,615 t in Cyprus as of 2016.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Cyprus and Tunisia?
91 t, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Tunisia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
How do Cyprus and Tunisia rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Cyprus ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf