El Salvador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- El Salvador
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 22 t against 10 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 12 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 2.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 122nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 123rd of 129 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44,651 t | 9.8 t | 44,641 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 32,284 t | 11 t | 32,273 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, El Salvador or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- El Salvador, at 22 t against 10 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between El Salvador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 12 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- El Salvador ranks 122nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 123rd of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf