French Polynesia vs Luxembourg: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- French Polynesia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 176 t against 148 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 28 t.
That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 125th and Luxembourg ranks 127th of 139 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 177.5 t | 6,657 t | 6,480 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 280.67 t | 4,534 t | 4,253 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 176.67 t | 81.33 t | 95.33 t | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, French Polynesia or Luxembourg?
- French Polynesia, at 176 t against 148 t in Luxembourg as of 2022.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between French Polynesia and Luxembourg?
- 28 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Luxembourg?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do French Polynesia and Luxembourg rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- French Polynesia ranks 125th and Luxembourg ranks 127th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf