Gabon vs Luxembourg: Urea — Agricultural Use

Gabon
165 t
in 2011
Luxembourg
148 t
in 2024
Gabon rank
126th
Luxembourg rank
127th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Gabon
  • Luxembourg
05.0k10.0k15.0k200220132024

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 165 t against 148 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 17 t.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Gabon ranks 126th and Luxembourg ranks 127th of 139 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 554 t 6,168 t 5,614 t Luxembourg
2010s 620 t 13,305 t 12,685 t Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Gabon or Luxembourg?
Gabon, at 165 t against 148 t in Luxembourg as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Gabon and Luxembourg?
17 t, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Luxembourg?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Gabon and Luxembourg rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Gabon ranks 126th and Luxembourg ranks 127th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf