Guatemala vs Peru: Urea — Agricultural Use

Guatemala
238,136 t
in 2011
Peru
255,619 t
in 2023
Guatemala rank
34th
Peru rank
31st

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Guatemala
  • Peru
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200220122023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 255,619 t against 238,136 t in Guatemala, a difference of 17,483 t.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 34th and Peru ranks 31st of 139 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 142,997 t 324,974 t 181,977 t Peru
2010s 209,754 t 339,874 t 130,120 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Guatemala or Peru?
Peru, at 255,619 t against 238,136 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Guatemala and Peru?
17,483 t, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Peru?
10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Guatemala and Peru rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Guatemala ranks 34th and Peru ranks 31st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf