Guatemala vs Syrian Arab Republic: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- Guatemala
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 238,136 t against 219,262 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 18,874 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Guatemala ranks 34th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 36th of 139 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 132,021 t | 327,902 t | 195,881 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 238,136 t | 219,262 t | 18,874 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Guatemala or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Guatemala, at 238,136 t against 219,262 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Guatemala and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 18,874 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Guatemala and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- Guatemala ranks 34th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 36th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf