Guyana vs Kuwait: Urea — Agricultural Use

Guyana
10,210 t
in 2011
Kuwait
11,034 t
in 2011
Guyana rank
87th
Kuwait rank
85th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Guyana
  • Kuwait
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k200220062011

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 11,034 t against 10,210 t in Guyana, a difference of 824 t.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kuwait ahead.

Guyana ranks 87th and Kuwait ranks 85th of 139 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Kuwait in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Kuwait Difference Ahead
2000s 13,293 t 66,667 t 53,374 t Kuwait
2010s 18,643 t 12,517 t 6,126 t Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Guyana or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at 11,034 t against 10,210 t in Guyana as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Guyana and Kuwait?
824 t, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Kuwait?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Guyana and Kuwait rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Guyana ranks 87th and Kuwait ranks 85th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf