Guyana vs Uganda: Urea — Agricultural Use

Guyana
10,210 t
in 2011
Uganda
10,743 t
in 2011
Guyana rank
87th
Uganda rank
86th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Guyana
  • Uganda
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200220062011

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 10,743 t against 10,210 t in Guyana, a difference of 533 t.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 87th and Uganda ranks 86th of 139 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 17,291 t 4,713 t 12,578 t Guyana
2010s 18,643 t 8,610 t 10,032 t Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Guyana or Uganda?
Uganda, at 10,743 t against 10,210 t in Guyana as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Guyana and Uganda?
533 t, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Uganda?
8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Guyana and Uganda rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Guyana ranks 87th and Uganda ranks 86th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf