Iceland vs Tunisia: Urea — Agricultural Use

Iceland
3,522 t
in 2023
Tunisia
3,706 t
in 2016
Iceland rank
107th
Tunisia rank
104th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Iceland
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k200220122023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 3,706 t against 3,522 t in Iceland, a difference of 184 t.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 107th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 139 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 92.67 t 3,958 t 3,865 t Tunisia
2010s 442.57 t 3,142 t 2,699 t Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Iceland or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 3,706 t against 3,522 t in Iceland as of 2016.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Iceland and Tunisia?
184 t, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2016.
How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Iceland ranks 107th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf