Libya vs Senegal: Urea — Agricultural Use

Libya
20,000 t
in 2016
Senegal
20,650 t
in 2020
Libya rank
79th
Senegal rank
78th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Libya
  • Senegal
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k200220112020

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 20,650 t against 20,000 t in Libya, a difference of 650 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 79th and Senegal ranks 78th of 139 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 60,500 t 21,482 t 39,018 t Libya
2010s 20,500 t 39,152 t 18,652 t Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Libya or Senegal?
Senegal, at 20,650 t against 20,000 t in Libya as of 2020.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Libya and Senegal?
650 t, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Senegal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
How do Libya and Senegal rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Libya ranks 79th and Senegal ranks 78th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf