Libya vs Switzerland: Urea — Agricultural Use

Libya
20,000 t
in 2016
Switzerland
19,499 t
in 2024
Libya rank
79th
Switzerland rank
80th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Libya
  • Switzerland
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k200220132024

How they compare

Libya currently reports 20,000 t against 19,499 t in Switzerland, a difference of 501 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 79th and Switzerland ranks 80th of 139 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 86,000 t 25,375 t 60,625 t Libya
2010s 20,500 t 18,399 t 2,101 t Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Libya or Switzerland?
Libya, at 20,000 t against 19,499 t in Switzerland as of 2016.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Libya and Switzerland?
501 t, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Switzerland?
9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
How do Libya and Switzerland rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Libya ranks 79th and Switzerland ranks 80th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf