Libya vs United Arab Emirates: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- Libya
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 24,477 t against 20,000 t in Libya, a difference of 4,477 t.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 79th and United Arab Emirates ranks 76th of 139 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86,000 t | 57,400 t | 28,600 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 20,500 t | 24,269 t | 3,769 t | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Libya or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 24,477 t against 20,000 t in Libya as of 2016.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Libya and United Arab Emirates?
- 4,477 t, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and United Arab Emirates?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Libya and United Arab Emirates rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- Libya ranks 79th and United Arab Emirates ranks 76th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf