Malta vs Montenegro: Urea — Agricultural Use

Malta
313 t
in 2011
Montenegro
404 t
in 2011
Malta rank
120th
Montenegro rank
119th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Malta
  • Montenegro
0200400600800200320072011

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 404 t against 313 t in Malta, a difference of 91 t.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 120th and Montenegro ranks 119th of 139 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 15 t 470 t 455 t Montenegro
2010s 175.5 t 328 t 152.5 t Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Malta or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 404 t against 313 t in Malta as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Malta and Montenegro?
91 t, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Montenegro?
5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2011.
How do Malta and Montenegro rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Malta ranks 120th and Montenegro ranks 119th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf