Nigeria vs Peru: Urea — Agricultural Use

Nigeria
242,761 t
in 2011
Peru
255,619 t
in 2023
Nigeria rank
33rd
Peru rank
31st

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Nigeria
  • Peru
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200220122023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 255,619 t against 242,761 t in Nigeria, a difference of 12,858 t.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Peru ahead.

Nigeria ranks 33rd and Peru ranks 31st of 139 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 191,797 t 324,974 t 133,177 t Peru
2010s 331,644 t 339,874 t 8,230 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Nigeria or Peru?
Peru, at 255,619 t against 242,761 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Nigeria and Peru?
12,858 t, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Peru?
10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Nigeria and Peru rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Nigeria ranks 33rd and Peru ranks 31st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf