Norway vs Sweden: Urea — Agricultural Use

Norway
272 t
in 2024
Sweden
178 t
in 2020
Norway rank
121st
Sweden rank
124th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Norway
  • Sweden
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k200820162024

How they compare

Norway currently reports 272 t against 178 t in Sweden, a difference of 94 t.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.5 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 121st and Sweden ranks 124th of 139 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 1,839 t 1,088 t 751 t Norway
2010s 233.3 t 1,230 t 997 t Sweden
2020s 112 t 178 t 66 t Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Norway or Sweden?
Norway, at 272 t against 178 t in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Norway and Sweden?
94 t, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Sweden?
12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
How do Norway and Sweden rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Norway ranks 121st and Sweden ranks 124th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf