Republic of Moldova vs Thailand: Urea — Agricultural Use
Urea — Agricultural Use over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 4.56 million t against 16,970 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 4.54 million t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 268.8 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 5th of 9 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,161 t | 2.50 million t | 2.50 million t | Thailand |
| 2010s | 13,683 t | 2.14 million t | 2.13 million t | Thailand |
| 2020s | 27,628 t | 3.90 million t | 3.87 million t | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Republic of Moldova or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 4.56 million t against 16,970 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Republic of Moldova and Thailand?
- 4.54 million t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Thailand rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 5th of 9 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf