Slovenia vs Uganda: Urea — Agricultural Use

Slovenia
10,059 t
in 2024
Uganda
10,743 t
in 2011
Slovenia rank
88th
Uganda rank
86th

Urea — Agricultural Use over time

  • Slovenia
  • Uganda
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200220132024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 10,743 t against 10,059 t in Slovenia, a difference of 684 t.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Slovenia ranks 88th and Uganda ranks 86th of 139 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 16,557 t 4,713 t 11,844 t Slovenia
2010s 14,127 t 8,610 t 5,516 t Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — agricultural use, Slovenia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 10,743 t against 10,059 t in Slovenia as of 2011.
What is the difference in urea — agricultural use between Slovenia and Uganda?
684 t, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Uganda?
8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Slovenia and Uganda rank globally for urea — agricultural use?
Slovenia ranks 88th and Uganda ranks 86th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
140 places, 1,732 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf