Australia vs Czechia: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use over time
- Australia
- Czechia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 128,677 t against 80,316 t in Czechia, a difference of 48,361 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.6 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Czechia ahead.
Australia ranks 7th and Czechia ranks 9th of 48 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110,721 t | 114,676 t | 3,955 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 164,963 t | 268,921 t | 103,958 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use, Australia or Czechia?
- Australia, at 128,677 t against 80,316 t in Czechia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use between Australia and Czechia?
- 48,361 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Czechia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Czechia rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use?
- Australia ranks 7th and Czechia ranks 9th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf